twitter

On Reciprocity in Social Media

by oscar on 2010/07/23

Reciprocity.

Main Entry: rec·i·proc·i·ty
Pronunciation: \ˌre-sə-ˈprä-s(ə-)tē\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural rec·i·proc·i·ties
Date: 1766

1 : the quality or state of being reciprocal : mutual dependence, action, or influence

I’m torn about this and I hope to explain why. Reciprocity is a problem right now in Social Media, its a rampant epidemic that needs to stop. The old cliche you scratch my back, I scratch your back wasn’t meant to be taken literally to everything you do. Here is where my rant comes in. Twitter for example, why do some people feel the need to follow everyone that follows them? I’m a techie, I have every tool available at my disposal and I know how to use them. I can switch from tweetdeck to hootsuite to co-tweet to seesmic to you-name-it in a heartbeat… yet I don’t follow more than 180 people. Why? Because it is impossible to actually follow all those people. I will not keep up with them if I followed 400 people, I couldn’t. So I know you also can’t. I’m also talking from experience, I’ve reached out to people with no response, or a 2 week later response that is starts with an apology because they have so many tweets to catch up on. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Acceptable shorthand Twitter chatter

by oscar on 2010/06/23

One of the faux paus of Twitter is abbreviating things just to fit your whole message. Abbreviating things just to get more words in is weak, if not outright dumb. Abbreviating words or using acronyms properly[1] is actually good so I think there’s actually a middle ground.

Ten years ago, if you wrote at the end of your email “LOL” most people would give you this look o_O as if wondering, WTF? Right, and then you’d be like OMG! you don’t know what LOL is? now I’m ROFL, BRB. Now a days everyone knows the big ones, like: LOL, OMG, WTF.

I used to hate short-hand “Internet” writings, those pseudo-abbreviations like “cuz” and “smthng” and even some of the ones I mentioned above. Then I realized that sometimes, they’re okay. Its okay to use abbreviations or acronyms, so long as they’re used in the proper context. In fact abbreviations have only been born out of necessity; they’re needed. We need (in Twitter) to convey a complete thought in 140 characters and to do so, we must type in our tweet as succinctly as possible. Sounds easy, but it is not. There are times where we simply can’t take one letter or word out without loosing meaning and we’re on revision 3 or 4.

Just like my hash-tags, here are the acronyms I use to say something that’s unambiguous. These are easily understood and I find them acceptable.

  1. AFAIK – As far as I know.
  2. IDC – I don’t care.
  3. IDK – I don’t know.
  4. IMHO – In my honest (or humble) opinion.
  5. RL – In real life, as opposed to a virtual environment.
  6. LMK – Let me know.
  7. LOL – Laughing out loud. Sadly, overused and undervalued.
  8. OMG – Oh my god.
  9. ROFL – Rolling on the floor laughing. Like LOL but on steroids.j
  10. RT – Retweet, a form of quoting someone else when they say something in Twitter.
  11. TTYL – Talk to you later.
  12. TTYS – Talk to you soon.
  13. TY – Thank you.
  14. TYSM – Thank you so much.
  15. WTF – What the f*ck.
  16. WTH – What the hell.
  17. YMMV – Your mileage may vary. Meaning, this works for me but you may have a different outcome.

Besides these, what other acronyms do you find acceptable in your social media circles? Surely, each demographic has their own more specialized examples that affect their industry or workspace. Shout out in the comments if you’d like.

Footnotes:
  1. The definition of proper also varies by medium, so what is proper in Twitter, may not be proper in a term paper for example. We’re talking about Twitter here. [source]

{ 0 comments }

Bluetooth Headset Giveaway Winner

by oscar on 2010/05/04

The other day, I announced a new giveaway. Here are the results.

The scoop

What: A twitter contest to giveaway a brand new Motorola bluetooth headset.
When: Contest ended last friday.
Who: This contest was open to anybody. Each participant got 5 entries for participating. The winner was selected at random.
[click to continue…]

{ 3 comments }

Hash-Tagging it up on Twitter

by oscar on 2010/04/19

I thought I’d write a little bit about hashtags. I use them in Twitter and sometimes I think more people should. I also think some people abuse them but I guess you have to take the good with the bad in this case.

Are you wondering, What’s a hashtag?

A hashtag is a word that is preceded by a #and signifies additional context to the tweet.

It can be used almost in anyway you want. Sometimes it is used formally, for example to tag the conversation about a specific talk in a conference. Other times, people use it loosely to describe stuff about their tweet. It could be emotion, location, sometimes even the completion of a thought or the type of tweet –a poll in this case. read the rest of this hashtastic article

{ 4 comments }

Do you want to try playing a tag game in blip.fm?

Use Tag #soundtracksat and share a song from a soundtrack you like. You can use it as a trivia game too and offer props for correct responses. It can ride on the existing #sountrack tag and its widely used.

This just adds the trivia element and props.

C’mon, lets play, and share it with your listeners too so they can join in. You can find me here, of course under @notagrouch.

If you’re not on Blip.fm and I didn’t send you an invitation, come join. It’s awesome. Go check it out

{ 0 comments }